Evaluation

This presenter was prepared, knowledgeable, and presented clinically relevant information: *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist)	Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist) - Agree	Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist) - Neutral	Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist) - Disagree	Dr. Justin Thomas (Pulmonologist) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist)	Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist) - Agree	Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist) - Neutral	Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist) - Disagree	Dr. Davood Vafai (Oncologist) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist)	Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist) - Agree	Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist) - Neutral	Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist) - Disagree	Dr. Constantin Dasanu (Oncologist) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon)	Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon) - Agree	Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon) - Neutral	Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon) - Disagree	Dr. Joseph Wilson (Surgeon) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist)	Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist) - Agree	Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist) - Neutral	Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist) - Disagree	Dr. Murthy Andavolu (Oncologist) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology)	Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology) - Strongly Agree	Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology) - Agree	Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology) - Neutral	Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology) - Disagree	Dr. Koushan Siami (Pathology) - Strongly Disagree
Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist)	Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist) - Strongly Agree	Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist) - Agree	Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist) - Neutral	Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist) - Disagree	Dr. James Cohn (Radiologist) - Strongly Disagree
The material was presented objectively	The material was presented objectively - Strongly Agree	The material was presented objectively - Agree	The material was presented objectively - Neutral	The material was presented objectively - Disagree	The material was presented objectively - Strongly Disagree

Content *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The content was relevant to my practice	The content was relevant to my practice - Strongly Agree	The content was relevant to my practice - Agree	The content was relevant to my practice - Neutral	The content was relevant to my practice - Disagree	The content was relevant to my practice - Strongly Disagree

The learning objectives for the meeting were met: *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community	I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community - Strongly Agree	I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community - Agree	I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community - Neutral	I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community - Disagree	I can better assess the impact of oncology cases in individual patients and the valley community - Strongly Disagree
I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research	I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research - Strongly Agree	I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research - Agree	I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research - Neutral	I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research - Disagree	I can better examine critical issues in treatment and research - Strongly Disagree
I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients	I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients - Strongly Agree	I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients - Agree	I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients - Neutral	I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients - Disagree	I can better apply the strategies discussed with my patients - Strongly Disagree
I can use what I learned	I can use what I learned - Strongly Agree	I can use what I learned - Agree	I can use what I learned - Neutral	I can use what I learned - Disagree	I can use what I learned - Strongly Disagree

ACS Compliance *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The cases presented were prospective	The cases presented were prospective - Strongly Agree	The cases presented were prospective - Agree	The cases presented were prospective - Neutral	The cases presented were prospective - Disagree	The cases presented were prospective - Strongly Disagree
Patient care options were fully discussed	Patient care options were fully discussed - Strongly Agree	Patient care options were fully discussed - Agree	Patient care options were fully discussed - Neutral	Patient care options were fully discussed - Disagree	Patient care options were fully discussed - Strongly Disagree
Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties	Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties - Strongly Agree	Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties - Agree	Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties - Neutral	Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties - Disagree	Discussion represented the views of multiple specialties - Strongly Disagree

What question did today's presentation raise for you?

What clinical topics would you like to see presented in the future:

Please list areas you might change in your practice as a result of this activity:

Comments:

Annenberg Center

Lung Cancer Tumor Conference 11-11-2015

Evaluation

Credit

Certificate

Course navigation

You are here

Lung Cancer Tumor Conference 11-11-2015

Evaluation

Evaluation

Credit

Certificate

Course navigation